Aims & Scope

EJSIR European Journal of Scientific Integration and Innovation

A cross-disciplinary forum for research that integrates scientific perspectives, technologies or methods to address complex questions. The journal welcomes methodological innovation and applied inquiry when the contribution of each field is explicit and conclusions remain proportionate to the evidence.

Journal aim and scope

The journal aims to publish work in which integration across scientific disciplines, technologies or methods is central to addressing a defined problem. It welcomes integrative concepts, cross-disciplinary research designs and carefully evaluated applications that make the relationship between contributing fields explicit.

Submissions may combine theoretical, experimental, computational, engineering, data-science or social-science approaches when each is justified by the question. Authors should explain how evidence is connected across fields, describe assumptions and methods, and report limitations and uncertainty. Interdisciplinary work should be more than parallel contributions assembled without a clear research logic.

Conclusions should follow from evidence appropriate to each component, and authors should distinguish demonstrated results from implications or future work. Research involving people, animals, sensitive data or protected material should report applicable ethics, consent, privacy and permissions.

Single-discipline studies without a clear integrative contribution, technology demonstrations without independent evaluation and proposals that do not support their conclusions with suitable evidence fall outside scope. Manuscripts must fit one or more of the academic sections described below.

Academic sections

The scope is organized into named sections so authors can identify the closest disciplinary route. Review each section description before selecting a journal.

Article types

Article type does not by itself determine suitability. The manuscript must fit the journal’s subject scope and meet the relevant standards for evidence, reporting, ethics and transparency.

Original Research Article

Presents a distinct scholarly question and original findings, with methods, analysis and evidence reported in enough detail for critical assessment.

Review Article

Synthesizes relevant scholarship to clarify the state of knowledge, compare interpretations and identify well-supported questions for further study.

Systematic Review

Uses a clearly defined question and reproducible search, selection and synthesis methods, with the evidence base and limitations reported transparently.

Short Communication

Reports a focused result, observation or method whose concise presentation is useful to the field and supported by appropriate evidence.

Technical Note

Describes a practical method, instrument, workflow or technical refinement, explaining its operation, context and performance or validation.

Perspective

Develops a reasoned scholarly interpretation of an important topic, distinguishing evidence from opinion and acknowledging relevant uncertainty.

Data / Resource Paper

Introduces a research dataset, software or other scholarly resource, documenting its provenance, structure, access conditions and quality checks.